Doubts concerning ActionItem#1011

[Daniel Costa Bucher]

Terceiro,


2013/8/7 Antonio Terceiro <terceiro at colivre.coop.br>

> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:35:56PM -0300, Daniel Costa Bucher wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> >
> > 2013/8/2 Ana Luísa Losnak <analosnak at gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > Daniel(UnB) and I are working on AI#1011 (
> > > https://noosfero.org/Development/ActionItem1011 ) and, talking with
> > > Terceiro, some questions appeared(Terceiro already mentioned some of
> them
> > > on AI page) and we would like your help:
> > >
> > > *- No reference to proprietary software (for example, Skype)*
> > >
> > > *- If there's the "default language" field, should we change
> > > automatically the user interface's language? If yes, do we have
> support for
> > > that? The user could then choose from a couple of languages(the ones we
> > > translated)?*
> > >
> > I think it'd be cool to have a dropdown with the languages for which
> > Noosfero has translation, and an 'other' option for other languages. If
> the
> > user chooses one of the translated languages, then the interface's
> language
> > would change to match it.
>
> that would be cool - but IMO that is already outside of the scope of that
> action item.
> To make things simple you could create a separate action item for it.
>
> > > *- What about the profile image? Should it always be optional and
> active?
> > > What the field "image" on person fields represents?*
> > > On person fields, there's a field called image, that is inactive even
> when
> > > there is the option to upload a picture when editing profile. We didn't
> > > understand what happens there.
> > > Also, we think the image should always be active and optional.
> > >
> > My understanding is that the 'image' on the manage_fields page is the
> > profile image. The thing is, as default, it is marked as not active, but
> on
> > the edit profile page there's an area for editing the profile picture
> > anyway. When we mark the image as active, there's no change on the edit
> > profile page and  if we mark the checkbox to include image on the signup
> > form, nothing happens aswell.
> >
> > In my opinion, the image field should always be active, thus the checkbox
> > 'Active' should remain marked on the manage_fields page and should be
> > disabled for editing. What's missing here is add the option to add the
> > image area on the signup page. Is that right?
>
> right
>
> the problem is that showing/not showing the optional fields during
> signup is handled in app/views/profile_editor/_person_form.html.erb (it
> is used from both the signup screen and from the "edit" profile screen),
> and the image field is not there. This is because any type of profile
> has an image, not only people, but then you will have to find a creative
> sollution that does not involve duplicating the image selection code for
> people and non-people.
>
> Can we have a partial that renders another partial? That way we could add
the image field on a partial and render it
on the _person_form.html.erb and on the _organization_custom_fields.rhtml
(that's the partial for both enterprise and community right?).

> > *- How do we proceed to correct/add translations?*
> > >
> > The doubt here is, how to we handle the translation process? Since we
> addes
> > extra fields to a person's form, some of them need translation. Do we go
> > ahead and do it for the languages we know? Do we submit the patch without
> > translation and post the fields in need of translation somewhere else?
>
> You shouldn't include translations in your patch at all - it makes the
> review a lot harder and diffs of PO files are too cumbersome and get
> outdated quickly.
>
> The translation process is handled separately. At the moment whoever is
> handling the release does the Portuguese translation as part of that
> process (or makes sure someone else does it).
>
> --
> Antonio Terceiro <terceiro at colivre.coop.br>
> Colivre - Cooperativa de Tecnologias Livres
> http://www.colivre.coop.br/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
>
>


-- 
Daniel Costa Bucher
Engenharia de Software
FGA/UnB
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.softwarelivre.org/pipermail/noosfero-dev/attachments/20130808/12c12552/attachment.html>