[feature-proposal] Forgot password improvements

[Ewout ter Haar]

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira
<caiotiago at colivre.coop.br> wrote:

>> So don't use User.first
>
> If the intersection is not empty (the sets aren't disjoint), the only
> way to avoid sending multiple emails in case of conflicts is to ask
> for the combination of field and value.

We can safely assume the intersection is not empty. We have various
people using their USP number as login.

Why do want so desperately to avoid send multiple emails? I return to
my original question: would this inconvenience be worth the usability
gain? I say yes.

Ewout