[feature-proposal] Forgot password improvements

[Hugo]

On 05-11-2013 23:44, Ewout ter Haar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira
> <caiotiago at colivre.coop.br> wrote:
>> If the intersection is not empty (the sets aren't disjoint), the only
>> way to avoid sending multiple emails in case of conflicts is to ask
>> for the combination of field and value.
> 
> We can safely assume the intersection is not empty. We have various
> people using their USP number as login.
> 
> Why do want so desperately to avoid send multiple emails? I return to
> my original question: would this inconvenience be worth the usability
> gain? I say yes.

I stopped a little bit to look for other ways of doing this keeping
usability.

Facebook accepts phone, mail and login in one field.
It always returns back with the profile info (photo, name etc) asking
you to confirm if that's you.

We could implement that solution just for "User.count > 2".

It doesn't need to be complex, just placing the name of the person next
to the name of the field it matched in the search.

What do you think?

> 
> Ewout
> _______________________________________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
>