[feature-proposal] Forgot password improvements

[Bráulio Bhavamitra]

Nice!
Em 06/11/2013 13:20, "Hugo" <hugo at riseup.net> escreveu:

> On 05-11-2013 23:44, Ewout ter Haar wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira
> > <caiotiago at colivre.coop.br> wrote:
> >> If the intersection is not empty (the sets aren't disjoint), the only
> >> way to avoid sending multiple emails in case of conflicts is to ask
> >> for the combination of field and value.
> >
> > We can safely assume the intersection is not empty. We have various
> > people using their USP number as login.
> >
> > Why do want so desperately to avoid send multiple emails? I return to
> > my original question: would this inconvenience be worth the usability
> > gain? I say yes.
>
> I stopped a little bit to look for other ways of doing this keeping
> usability.
>
> Facebook accepts phone, mail and login in one field.
> It always returns back with the profile info (photo, name etc) asking
> you to confirm if that's you.
>
> We could implement that solution just for "User.count > 2".
>
> It doesn't need to be complex, just placing the name of the person next
> to the name of the field it matched in the search.
>
> What do you think?
>
> >
> > Ewout
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noosfero-dev mailing list
> > Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
> > http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.softwarelivre.org/pipermail/noosfero-dev/attachments/20131107/638f9cba/attachment-0001.html>