Merge requests?

Wed Sep 11 15:20:26 BRT 2013

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Tygel <dtygel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Terceiro and others,
>
>     Discussing "live" makes things quicker, give a feeling of real
> collectivity and mutual understanding and allow for immediate decisions.
> Writing messages like we're doing here normally creates a back and forth
> process of days, and get lost with other topics that emerge.
>
>     We already agreed that there is the need of other ways to have an
> active community besides the mailing list. I'm only suggesting that we
> discuss the concrete problem posed by Paulo in our next community meeting.
>
>      This problem arised by Paulo has to do with prioritizing the review
> and merge process. Aurium already made some advancement creating the "I
> care" tool. If in every community meeting we could check the existing merge
> requests and prioritize some of them, this would be a very good guidance
> for the scarce existing workforce of reviewing and accepting the requests.
>
>      I often feel lost with all this e-mails in this list. Topics get
> lost. Ideas get lost. Action Items get lost in the foswiki. And some merge
> requests remain as merge requests for ages while others go fast. Having a
> presential moment where we could recover and remember sets of features and
> merge-requests could be good practice: it is collective, it is community.
>
Agree. To say that the community meeting isn't important is the same as
saying that Colivre shouldn't do its developer meeting to talk about
noosfero and should only use the mailing list.

>
>          Cheers,
>
>                 daniel
>
>
> Em 11-09-2013 11:21, Antonio Terceiro escreveu:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:47:43AM -0600, Daniel Tygel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Paulo and others,
>>>
>>>     I have a suggestion: that we discuss it in the next community
>>> virtual meeting, which in the last 2 times didn't work. My feeling
>>> is that our community meetings could concentrate in prioritizing
>>> merge-requests and evaluating this dynamics.
>>>
>>>     Of course, one future possibility would be to expand the range of
>>> people being able to analyze and accept merge requests.
>>>
>> Everyone can already do code reviews. It's public. One doesn't need
>> commit access to the official repository to do code reviews.
>>
>> Actually, if a committer comes across a MP that was already reviewed,
>> it's a lot quicker to get it merged ...
>>
>>      Luísa, Bráulio, Rodrigo and others: what about discussing this in
>>> the next virtual meeting of noosfero's community? Maybe with a
>>> concrete agenda (and this question raised by Paulo is a real
>>> important one) we could achieve to have the virtual meetings
>>> functioning?
>>>
>>>     Each community meeting could be done using both google hangout
>>> (or skype) for voice and one pad in a forum for registering the
>>> notes and decisions, like we've been doing with some collectivities
>>> in Cirandas.
>>>
>>>     If you want, I prepared this environment in Cirandas, with a
>>> forum where all pads of each meeting would be available for tracking
>>> our discussions. I prepared a first example meeting here:
>>> http://cirandas.net/noosfero
>>> Click in the topic "24 de setembro de 2013" to see an example of a
>>> public meeting pad.
>>>
>>>      Let's try?
>>>
>> I would expect for us for *first* discuss things publicly in the mailing
>> list (which, again, is public, archived, and does not depend on people
>> to be available at specific times) before we have to resort to these
>> meetings.  I think we should leave the meetings for the stuff we can't
>> figure out by email.
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Noosfero-dev mailing list
>> Noosfero-dev at listas.**softwarelivre.org<Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org>
>> http://listas.softwarelivre.**org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**noosfero-dev<http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev at listas.**softwarelivre.org<Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org>
> http://listas.softwarelivre.**org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**noosfero-dev<http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev>
>

-- 
"Lute pela sua ideologia. Seja um com sua ideologia. Viva pela sua
ideologia. Morra por sua ideologia" P.R. Sarkar

EITA - Educação, Informação e Tecnologias para Autogestão
http://cirandas.net/brauliobo
http://eita.org.br

"Paramapurusha é meu pai e Parama Prakriti é minha mãe. O universo é meu
lar e todos nós somos cidadãos deste cosmo. Este universo é a imaginação da
Mente Macrocósmica, e todas as entidades estão sendo criadas, preservadas e
destruídas nas fases de extroversão e introversão do fluxo imaginativo
cósmico. No âmbito pessoal, quando uma pessoa imagina algo em sua mente,
naquele momento, essa pessoa é a única proprietária daquilo que ela
imagina, e ninguém mais. Quando um ser humano criado mentalmente caminha
por um milharal também imaginado, a pessoa imaginada não é a propriedade
desse milharal, pois ele pertence ao indivíduo que o está imaginando. Este
universo foi criado na imaginação de Brahma, a Entidade Suprema, por isso
a propriedade deste universo é de Brahma, e não dos microcosmos que também
foram criados pela imaginação de Brahma. Nenhuma propriedade deste mundo,
mutável ou imutável, pertence a um indivíduo em particular; tudo é o
patrimônio comum de todos."
Restante do texto em
http://cirandas.net/brauliobo/blog/a-problematica-de-hoje-em-dia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.softwarelivre.org/pipermail/noosfero-dev/attachments/20130911/145e614a/attachment.html>