[feature-proposal] Forgot password improvements

["Aurélio A. Heckert"]

I'm not against Rodrigo's idea of selecting fields (although _usage 
issue_), if it uses exact match on database.

I'm not against Ewout's proposal of sending e-mails for all matched 
profiles with the Terceiro's power-point and a *captcha*.

  Aurium

Em 12-11-2013 15:42, Rodrigo Souto escreveu:
> Hey Ewout, I see that you are really upset about the divergence here on
> the list about this issue but I hope you see, as I do, that there is no
> reason to be.
>
> Although in your mind it's completely clear that the "two-emails-thing"
> and the "information-leakage-stuff" are really small related to the
> usability issues associated, it might not be clear on other people's
> mind (specially when those minds are computer scientists' minds).
>
> See, I still think that the select field is much better than all of
> these options, since I don't think selecting which field you want to use
> is really a hard task at all, specially considering all the other
> problems we are finding to remove it. But I saw that my opinion was
> overwhelmed by everyone else so I just respected that and tried to find
> and help with other solutions (as a matter of fact I was already
> developing the solution we had agreed until Aurium disagreed). That's
> what collective decision is all about, back and forth until a final
> point.
>
> The other point I have to make is this continuous "Colivre's against us all
> thing". When we discuss on the list, we don't unite on the background to
> come up with "Colivre's unified point of view (coincidentally being
> always against the opinions of the community)". These are just Rodrigo,
> Caio, Aurélio, Terceiro and whoever; speaking out their minds. Of course
> in some too large cases (like that one you-know-which) we must define
> Colivre's (as a organization) point of view but on 99% of the cases is
> just us, individual people with their own opinions.
>
> I really like all the communication we can have today that allows all of
> this discussion. I thought this feature, as an example, wasn't even
> needed to be discussed since I thought it was just so simple, but Ewout
> himself convinced me to put it up for discussion and I got surprised
> with all the divergent opinions everyone had about it. And this is
> great, although tiring some times. But if we want to continue developing
> in such environment, we must get used to have people disagreeing with
> us and talk in the most clear and reasonable way (avoiding sarcasms and all
> these aggressive stuff that just mess up the discussion).
>
> (I hope I'm not sounding condescending, I just don't see why we should
> go attacking each other instead of respecting each ones ideas and try to
> argument and get to an agreement).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev em listas.softwarelivre.org
> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev


-- 

*Aurélio A. Heckert (aka Aurium)*
http://softwarelivre.org/aurium
*COLIVRE --- Coop. de Tecnologias Livres*
http://colivre.coop.br

*Inkscape* --- Desenhe Livremente
http://inkscapeBrasil.org
-------------- Pr?xima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://listas.softwarelivre.org/pipermail/noosfero-dev/attachments/20131112/f6af1898/attachment.html>
-------------- Pr?xima Parte ----------
Um anexo n?o-texto foi limpo...
Nome: logoColivre_p.gif
Tipo: image/gif
Tamanho: 5576 bytes
Descri??o: n?o dispon?vel
URL: <http://listas.softwarelivre.org/pipermail/noosfero-dev/attachments/20131112/f6af1898/attachment.gif>