Bug: communities with no members....

Hugo hugo at riseup.net
Thu Mar 12 13:23:04 BRT 2015


I agree with it.
If nobody wants to participate a community there's no need to keep the
community.
The requirement to add other admin first solves the problem.

On 12/03/2015 12:36, daniel tygel wrote:
> You argument is valid for "important" communities, but not for trash
> communities, that were left by error or by mis usage.
> 
> I think the best behaviour should be like in yahoogroups:
> 
> --> If the only admin of a community tries to leave, and there are other
> members, a message should tell him/her that he/she should first define
> another user as admin so that he/she can leave.
> --> If there is no other members in the community, there should be a
> really big and highlighted message warning that, since this person is
> the only member, the community will be removed if he/she leaves. So the
> system highly recommends that the user tries to find another user to
> join and become admin, to leave afterwards, and that in this moment, if
> the person REALLY wants to remove the community, he/she will be able to
> leave and the community will disappear.
> 
>    In this way, we prevent the system to have orphan communities, which
> are useless and may accumulate becoming trash.
> 
>        daniel
> 
> On 12-03-2015 12:04, Rodrigo Souto wrote:
>> Because he/she wants to?  ;)
>>
>> The problem of removing a community is that you lose all the history of
>> it. If the community is so important that a random user should not
>> become admin of it, then the admins should be concerned about leaving it
>> without admins.
>>
>> daniel tygel escreveu isso ai:
>>> Ok, but why allow him/her to leave an orphan community?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12-03-2015 11:49, Rodrigo Souto wrote:
>>>> Hey Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> When the person is the last administrator leaving a community, there is
>>>> an alert page that informs that to the user and suggest that before
>>>> leaving he/she should add another administrator. Check it out:
>>>> http://noosfero.org/Development/ActionItem1400
>>>>
>>>> daniel tygel escreveu isso ai:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>    If a profile is the single member of a community or enterprise, and is
>>>>> removed, the community should also be removed, with an alert before that.
>>>>> Now, the community ends up having nobody after the personal profile is
>>>>> removed...
>>>>>
>>>>>    Is there a way for other people (non committers) to create issues in
>>>>> gitlab, or should we send messages here in the community?
>>>>>
>>>>>         daniel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Noosfero-dev mailing list
>>>>> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
>>>>> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Noosfero-dev mailing list
>>>> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
>>>> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noosfero-dev mailing list
>>> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
>>> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noosfero-dev mailing list
>> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
>> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev
> 



More information about the Noosfero-dev mailing list