always assume good faith

[daniel tygel]

I cited the part of the message which was highly offensive, but ok, I 
repeat it here:

Eita doesn't follow his "own procedure" and Eita wants everybody else follow It


daniel

Em 18-06-2014 12:42, Antonio Terceiro escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:20:25AM -0300, Daniel Tygel wrote:
>> This is such a bad message, I won't go into details.
>>
>> Only one thing I really had to mention: "Eita doesn't follow his "own
>> procedure" and Eita wants everybody else follow It.  Really?". It was
>> **not** our **own procedure**, it was a **consensual decision among
>> different people.
>>
>> We don't want to impose **anything**. If we did not follow a procedure in
>> your mentioned actionitems, I must thank you for highlighting that (this is
>> not crucifixing), so that we can correct this.
>>
>> It is impossible to discuss with these kinds of acusations implicited in the
>> message of Leandro: summing up, he gives the idea that eita wants to
>> "impose" things for our own benefit. This is such a profound accusation that
>> I refute event to respond to it.
>>
>> I will say it only one more time here: we are willing and committed on
>> **contributing** to a **collectively** construction of better ways for this
>> software (noosfero) to be developped.
>>
>> So I ask you to stop saying that our organization has "hidden agendas" or
>> "is against" some person or organization or that we only think about our own
>> interests. This is unacceptable, both morally, ethically and also it does
>> not correspond to any reasonable fact.
>>
>> We are not playing here. We want to build collectively for collective better
>> results.
>>
>> As for the rest of this awful message, I prefer to not say anything.
> Leandro's email didn't sound offensive to me at all. Would you mind
> pointing out exactly what he wrote that put you off so much? The one
> place where me mentioned you was immediately followed by a explanation
> that it was not an accusation.
>
> A very good principle to follow in community discussions is to always
> assume good faith.
>
> If you think someone is against you, it's most commonly a communication
> problem; either he didn't express his thoughts very clearly, or you
> didn't understand what he meant.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.softwarelivre.org/pipermail/noosfero-dev/attachments/20140618/c24af7b2/attachment.html>