Isn't it time to extend this list limit of 40Kb for messages?

daniel tygel dtygel at eita.org.br
Tue Nov 11 00:06:50 BRST 2014


Thanks for your understanding.

Best,

      daniel

On 10-11-2014 10:52, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:10:56PM -0200, Daniel Tygel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>      Since our simple message about the responsive had 50Kb (yes, a big
>> text), it was held for moderation.
> The message has a plain text part that is 7.3KB, and a redundant/useless
> HTML part which is 6 times bigger ...
>
> [text/plain, quoted, utf-8, 7,3K]
> [text/html, quoted, utf-8, 45K]
>
>>      I'd like to suggest that the lists noosfero-dev and noosfero-br have
>> their limits extended to 200Kb. What do you think?
> I'd like people to stop sending HTML mail, but since I am really tired
> of explaining this over and over (mostly to the same people, e.g.
> yourself), I just extended the limit to 200kb as you requested.
>
> Defeated by insistence,
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noosfero-dev mailing list
> Noosfero-dev at listas.softwarelivre.org
> http://listas.softwarelivre.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/noosfero-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.softwarelivre.org/pipermail/noosfero-dev/attachments/20141111/b719e2e4/attachment.html>


More information about the Noosfero-dev mailing list